George W Bush Authorized 911 Attacks Says Government Insider
Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.
This was published in the Pakistan Daily, May 20, 2008. It was brought to my attention (listserv) by Dr. Steven Jonas who writes at Political Junkies.
Here’s a bit about the interviewee from the start of the article:
Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff.
Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to people.
The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones’ radio show.
Note: All honor to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may know the truth of 9/11.
The Bush Junta Unmasked
“This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder.” –Stanley Hilton
Accepting this as truth, what then?
-That the actions of a core of elite leaders - whose decision making cannot be without vested interests - are good old fashioned evil exactly in the Judeo-Christian sense that Nazi Germany’s actions were evil?
-That the U.S. government would be the engineers of the mass murder of its own people to create the pretext for the mass murder of other people? (Accepting, of course, that the mass murder is incidental. It is nothing more than a necessary occurrence in the service of far different objectives.)
Accepting this as truth, what then?
Then we are the ignorant fools we’ve been raised to be! Our understanding of the basics of military action, security, and terrorism not to mention the laws of physics are so rudimentary that our leaders can with impunity dupe (most of) us into believing a colossal lie! Why not let us behave as our leaders then and first kill a family member before killing someone else’s family member! And I’m sure amongst us there are people who would do exactly that. And you know how we regard those folk.
Accepting this as truth, what then?
-That democracy has become (always was?) a veneer whereby the core elite of a nation-state gain sanction to do what ever they want as long as the people who choose them can be duped?
How could we truly believe something so heinous could be perpetrated by this core elite? Do any of us really want to fathom that reality? That we are the ruled - the manipulated, the governed - rendered intellectually docile in the face of acts of evil? (Unless, of course, we are bloodthirsty ourselves and feel at one with the policies of mass murder in the name of …. some Higher purpose perhaps?)
How could we really believe this? It would make our World War II derived distinction between good and evil impossible to maintain. We’d be left with evil and evil. We’d have to begin to think of the U.S. governing elite in terms of evil. That would force comparisons we’d rather not make. Better to deny the whole matter, celebrate mass murder and/or make a shit-load of money off it instead!
If George W. Bush authorized the 9/11 attacks; if the attacks were in some major way an insider job, whether we are ignorant about it or not … well that’s the point isn’t it? What would be different if we were knowledgeable about it? Could elections really prevent such decision making? Can we really just vote them out of office? Would they already be incarcerated? Would we in any way be able to use traditional methods of justice to bring the mass murdering criminals to the kind of justice we give the common off-the-street mass murderer?
Can I hear laughter?
2 comments
The english right away looks suspect in the first sentence. I doubt any american would write that sentence. Secondly, the wording doesnt sound like someone of that age, it is written like someone young enough to be affected by email/SMS writing. And I doubt that Bush could plan to brush his own teeth in the morning without help. A good rule of thumb is dont believe anyone claiming to be a Bush insider that is first published in a pakistani newspaper.
The piece published in the Pakistani News can also be found here and here and here. It was first published in 2004. It is an interview. The interviewer is American Alex Jones (for more on Jones see this or this). The interviewee is American Stanley Hilton (for more on Hilton see this or this). The claim is that he is a government insider. This is true.
The interview rather than transcription can be found here.
A good rule of thumb is to not post a link to advertising if you want your misinformation to misinform rather than embarrass. None of this makes Hilton’s claims true. What is true, however, is that an American government insider made these claims to an American interviewer.